LANGUAGE BLOG
Part One
v
For this assignment, I spent twenty minutes
trying to converse with my twelve year old brother without speaking, writing or
using ASL. This was very, very difficult
for many reasons. First, he was getting very frustrated with me because he
could not understand what I was trying to say. Second, the conversation about a
simple topic took infinitely longer than it would if we could verbally
communicate. What I noticed about his
reaction to my inability to speak is that he had a very difficult time talking
to me without my ability to respond. One
improvement that became apparent with this form of communication is that there is much greater eye
contact; you cannot take your eyes off each other when attempting this form of
communication otherwise the conversation ends, which may inadvertently increase the personal connection between people.
v
My partner was definitely in control of the
conversation. I could only try to answer
him, but I was unable to initiate portions of the conversation so he was the
only party who could initiate and carry on the conversation. I had to keep tapping him in order to get his
attention when he looked away so that he knew I was trying to tell him
something. He definitely had the balance
of power in the conversation. Admittedly, it was the longest 20 minutes of my
life.
v
The only culture that could communicate complex
ideas within their population would be the culture that has mastered verbal
communication. There is only so much
that you can communicate with bodily motions.
You can demonstrate how to do something or where to go without verbal
communication, but trying to explain what, when, or why is virtually impossible
without verbal communication. Therefore, a population that lacks verbal
communication would be very limited in their knowledge and would be much more reliant
upon one another because every instruction has to be physically demonstrated. Cultures that can verbally communicate have
the ability to be more mobile, educated, and autonomous.
A speaking culture would certainly believe that a culture that does not
use symbolic language is very unintelligent, primitive, and inferior. In the modern world, the only humans I can
think of that do not speak are nuns and monks that take a vow of silence. Unfortunately, these individuals do not
represent an entire culture, but rather small religious sects within wider
communities and cultures. These
individuals usually have the ability to communicate, yet they choose not to.
Part Two
v
This segment of the experiment was significantly
easier because the ability to communicate verbally allowed this conversation to
be more relaxed and comfortable for both my partner and myself. We both noticed, however, that there are
multiple aspects that make this form of communication difficult. First, talking without altering one’s tone is
nearly impossible because it is a habitual human behavior. Second, it is much more difficult than it
seems it would be to speak without moving one’s eyebrows. It requires complete concentration to speak
without making bodily movements, eyebrow contortions, and tone
fluctuations. Neither party had
difficulty understanding one another, but the conversation was altered by our
inability to physically embellish our thoughts.
This second portion of the experiment was very educational and amusing
because we realized how much humans take the ability to embellish speech for
granted.
v
I believe this experiment proves that at one
time, humans relied almost exclusively on the ability to physically
communicate. Non-speech language allows
humans to express excitement and emotion, which are vital components in complex
communication. With the use of
non-speech language humans are able to more effectively express anger,
happiness, sorrow, fear, and urgency.
Even without the utterance of a single word, a perceptive individual can
read body language to comprehend how another person is feeling at any given
time.
v
The adaptive benefit of reading body language
allows one to sense danger by gauging the reactions of other humans or animals. This is an effective tool for hunting or
escaping danger posed by nearby predators.
When competing for resources or mates, it is also helpful to read the
body language of competitors to ascertain how willing they are to fight you for
what they hope to gain. You can also
read body language to judge the passivity of other individuals, which allows
you to know when or when not to act aggressively.
I could feel the frustration that you and your brother felt when I was reading your post. I could really relate to the communication block for part one. I do agree that there was a lot more eye contact. I did not realize that until after I read your blog. I noticed that my partner would watch my a lot more for my reactions, and it was like I was trying to speak to him through my eyes as well.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, I enjoyed reading it! I agree with the following statement that, "...population that lacks verbal communication would be very limited in their knowledge and would be much more reliant upon one another because every instruction has to be physically demonstrated." This would be a lifelong game of charades!
ReplyDeleteVery good description of Part A and good discussion on the issue of power.
ReplyDeleteWhile I see your point on those in non-speaking religious cultures, that is a limitation by choice, not ability. What about a person traveling to another country without speaking the language? We see that all the time with immigrants to our country. How do American's treat immigrants? You also see this in the parent-child relationship (with a small baby or toddler) or with individuals who have limited speech ability because of a physical or mental disability.
Very thorough description of Part B.
Yes, non-spoken language contributes meaning and clarification, but it also allows people to verify what you are saying, kind of like a lie-detector. If your body language doesn't match the words you are saying, this tells the person that you aren't telling the truth and perhaps can't be trusted. Why would this be beneficial in an adaptive sense?
Can you think of a group of people who have difficulty reading body language?
Is the "interview" situation really a place where you wouldn't want to read body language? Nervousness might be distracting, but if I were an employer, I would want to know the person responds to pressure and also if they were being honest or not. Under what situations might body language lie to you? Are there conditions where you might not understand what it is saying? Do all cultures use the same system of body language?
I find it funny how you were explaining in your blog post that your partner was the one who was frustrated because when i tried this assignment with my partner I was the one who was really frustrated because i tried my hardest to make my partner understand what i was trying to say and he wouldn't understand me. I got really frustrated but i think its really cool how everyone has their own experience trying out this experiment. I really enjoyed your blog!
ReplyDeleteHey great post but yeah it sounds like you forgot that there are people that do exist out there that have communication disabilities, but I don't think it takes away from their intelligence. It is not virtually impossible to express complex thoughts with just physical motions, because that's what deaf and mute people already do. I have always wondered what it's like, but then again I am not that curious because it looks like it must be somewhat alienating as well. I recently read in a Time magazine article about how an entire neighborhood in Istanbul banded together and took a month to learn sign language so that they could surprise a new deaf neighbor and help him feel more welcome to their community. It was pretty sweet.
ReplyDelete