1A. Humans and horses derive from a common
ancestor and both species possess homologous traits such as limbs that have the
same bone structure.
1B.
Humans and horses are both limbed creatures.
Humans have arms and horses have legs. In humans, the arm limbs are made
up of the humerus, radius, ulna, metacarpals, and phalanges. Similarly, horses also have these components
in their leg limbs. The function of the
arm trait enables humans to build, carry climb, etc.. The function of the leg trait in horses is
different from that of the human arm. A
horses leg allow a horse to gallup, run, walk, pull equipment, and catapult their weight, and carry the weight of other objects. As the two species evolved, each animal
developed various uses for these traits, hence as the uses changed, the trait
also changed, to form the variation in uses and appearances in the respective species we see today.
1C. Humans are categorized under the order:
primates. Horses are grouped under the
order: perissodactyla. The commonality
between horses and humans is that both orders are members of the subclass Eutheria,
which are placental mammals. Proving
that the common ancestor, Eutheria, had this same homologous trait (moveable
limbs) is very difficult, because the fossils that have been discovered are
limited to mostly dental and skull remains.
1D.
2A. Bats and butterflies are both examples of
analogous creatures. They both have
wings that perform the same function of flying, but both species look different
and they are not derived from a common ancestor.
2B. The wings are the analogous traits between a
butterfly and a bat. The function of this trait allows both species to fly and
perform aerial locomotion. Structurally,
butterfly wings lack bones and they are covered in scales. Additionally,
butterflies have two pairs of wings. In
opposition to butterflies, bat wings have bones and they are covered with bare
skin. Furthermore, bats only possess one pair of wings. Although the
aforementioned data proves that the structure of the wings of the butterfly and
the bat are significantly different, this analogous trait exhibits similarities
in that both types of wings allow for aerial locomotion.
2C. True. All organisms share some form of common
ancestor, however, butterflies are categorized as insects, whereas bats are
categorized as flying mammals. There is
no scientific proof or fossil records indicating that either species is closely
related, therefore, wings have evolved independently in these two species. Thus
the wings of both species can be considered an analogous trait.
2D.
I enjoyed reading your blog it was very insightful. It is interesting that there is a commonality between horses and humans. In regards to the analogous traits between a butterfly and a bat, yes one might think that they both share a common trait because of their wings, but as you indicated above, this cannot be due to the fact that they do not have a common ancestor.
ReplyDeleteGreat discussion and description of your homologous traits.
ReplyDelete"Proving that the common ancestor, Eutheria, had this same homologous trait (moveable limbs) is very difficult, because the fossils that have been discovered are limited to mostly dental and skull remains."
No, that isn't the case (source?). We certainly have enough evidence of mammalian fossil records to confirm that there is a general archaic limb structure to early mammals, inherited from archaic reptiles, inherited from archaic amphibians, that shows the shared structures and confirming that the similarities we see in modern mammals are due to common descent. Differences are due to divergent evolution resulting from different environmental pressures.
"Bats and butterflies are both examples of analogous creatures."
Careful. There is really no such thing as analogous "creatures". There are organisms with analogous structures. That is a very different.
"There is no scientific proof or fossil records indicating that either species is closely related, therefore, wings have evolved independently in these two species."
You don't need two organisms to be closely related to share homologous structures. For example, the tiny ear ossicles (bones) in our middle ear are genetically related to the branchial (gill) arches of fish. They are homologous. No kidding. So distance between species doesn't mean all of their structures are automatically analogous.
So what do we know about these species that confirms analogous status? Well, we know that bats are mammals and that the generalized, ancestral form of mammals is for them to not possess wings. Wings in bats evolved independently after the development of the mammalian group, long after the common split with insects some 100's of millions of years ago. That independent evolution is what we need to know to confirm that these traits are analogous and not the result of common descent.
Good images.
This was great. I had issues with this assignment, but you did a great job. I love the pictures and that you picked horses and humans as your homologous species.
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I enjoyed reading your blog because although to others its common sense that human and horse would have similar bone structure it really never occurred to me until reading your post and seeing your pics exampling it. In regards to the butterfly and bat its crazy to see these two completely different creatures share some similarities. Good job and great pics!
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I enjoyed reading your blog because although to others its common sense that human and horse would have similar bone structure it really never occurred to me until reading your post and seeing your pics exampling it. In regards to the butterfly and bat its crazy to see these two completely different creatures share some similarities. Good job and great pics!
ReplyDelete